Belcopa
Multiple-sclerosis symptomology Research concept — protocol development
Development architecture
Two lead concepts are moving through different scientific and regulatory pathways under one evidence standard.
Multiple-sclerosis symptomology Research concept — protocol development
Multiple-sclerosis symptomology Investigational product concept — preclinical planning
Program comparison
The pipeline is designed to prevent a behavioral protocol and a controlled-substance combination product from being represented as if they face the same development questions.
| Program | Intervention type | Current evidence | Near-term work | Material uncertainty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belcopa Practitioner-mediated behavioral intervention | Context, consent, ritual, and symptom interpretation | Conceptual rationale; no pilot dataset | Ethics review, protocol fidelity, comparator and debriefing design | Whether the intervention produces measurable benefit under informed conditions | Protocol development |
| NovusClarus 50 mg MDMA + 500 mg acetaminophen | Once-weekly fixed-dose pharmaceutical concept | Single-subject low-dose MDMA case; combination not directly tested | Source-data audit, CMC feasibility, safety strategy, pre-IND planning | Component contribution, dose, safety, indication, and efficacy | Preclinical planning |
Development gates
Each gate requires documented evidence, independent review, and a recorded decision.
Source records, literature, mechanism, confounders, and open questions.
Consent, exclusions, monitoring, aftercare, privacy, and risk governance.
Manufacturing, sourcing, protocol delivery, site capacity, and cost.
Prospective endpoints, comparators, component analysis, and independent statistics.
Proceed, redesign, pause, partner, license, or discontinue.