Multiple Sclerosis Neurology
Indication definition, disease heterogeneity, symptom endpoints, DMT context, and clinical relevance.
Scientific advisory seatOpen institutional roles
Independent expertise to challenge the science, protect participants, and shape the company’s development architecture.
Priority expertise
The initial board is organized by the questions that must be answered before either program can credibly advance.
Indication definition, disease heterogeneity, symptom endpoints, DMT context, and clinical relevance.
Scientific advisory seatDose rationale, pharmacokinetics, cardiovascular and psychiatric safety, interactions, and abuse potential.
Scientific advisory seatHepatic risk, cumulative exposure, pain rationale, combination design, and participant instructions.
Clinical safety seatFour-arm component study, estimands, sample size, missing data, multiplicity, and reporting.
Methods advisory seatBelcopa disclosure boundary, consent, debriefing, vulnerability, trust, and independent oversight.
Ethics advisory seatPre-IND sequence, controlled-substance requirements, GMP, formulation, analytical, and quality strategy.
Development advisory seatExpected commitment
Submit professional background, expertise, conflicts, and the program questions you are prepared to examine.
Advisory participation does not imply endorsement of Belcopa, NovusClarus, the underlying manuscript, or any future trial. Independent criticism is a core function of the board.