Perceptual Event Visualizer: Same Cube, Three Symbolic Filters

This research model treats numerical base as a top-down symbolic scaffold layered over a common visual event. It does not claim that base-10, base-20, or base-60 changes retinal input or primary visual cortex itself. Instead, it visualizes how learned numeric systems could bias attention, grouping, interval memory, angular segmentation, and the perceived organization of the same 3D object.
Base-10: Linear decimal parsing
10
Dominant groupingHalves, fifths, tenths
Attention biasMetric edges and Cartesian faces
Memory traceRectilinear snapshots
Construction metaphorMeasured object
Base-20: Vigesimal body-count parsing
20
Dominant grouping5, 10, 15, 20 anchors
Attention biasCorner clusters and embodied count points
Memory traceGrouped pulses
Construction metaphorHandled object
Base-60: Sexagesimal angular parsing
60
Dominant grouping6, 12, 30, 60 phase divisions
Attention biasRotation, angle, and modular symmetry
Memory traceClock-like phase residue
Construction metaphorOriented event

What this visualizer is testing

The cube is identical in all three panels. The experimental difference is the symbolic filter applied after projection: decimal measurement, vigesimal grouped embodiment, or sexagesimal angular phase. This lets you observe whether the same object feels more like a measured box, a handled/grouped box, or a rotational/time-like event.

Visual code

Blue lines: current projected cube edges.
Green points: base-20 embodied grouping anchors.
Yellow rings/rays: base-60 angular phase scaffold.
Red glints: high-salience perceptual prediction points.